Posts Tagged ‘public relations’

I’ve finally arrived!!!

Monday, April 12th, 2010

Yes, it’s finally happened.  I’m now on YouTube.  I was recently part of an amazing evening at Ignite Bristol – an import from the Ignite concept that first happened in Seattle in 2006.  As anyone who has been through any Net.Mentor training will know, I hate PowerPoint with a passion.  However, the concept of a timed 5 minutes with 20 slides in quite a buzz and some of the presentations on the first evening were stimulating, moving, funny or just completely off the wall.  In the end, I went for the serious topic of handling crisis, but I hope it was light enough to be all of the above.  You be the judge…

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
  • Netvibes
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
  • Share/Bookmark

Crisis and the power of social media

Thursday, March 25th, 2010

There have been plenty of examples recently of the power of social media and the internet in creating and overcoming corporate crisis.  Most recently the Greenpeace and Nestle spat demonstrated more than just the development of the original issue itself  (the environmental effects of the palm oil manufacture).   The handling of the initial feedback by Nestle showed that if you are going to get involved in the debate, you need to keep your cool and stick to the issues – as highlighted by this excellent presentation from Scott Douglas.

The result of nestle’s fan page moderator getting personal went way beyond the original issue and became the story in itself. It reminds me of the classic West Wing episode where Josh Lyman decides to comment personally on the Lemonlyman website, only to wonder why he suddenly turns from hero to villain and CJ threatens personal injury with a motherboard.

The lesson? Stick to the issues; stay focused on the facts and look for the collaborative option. The best communication is two-way and changes behaviours on BOTH sides. This is a prime example of how to get the balance completely wrong and pay the corporate consequences. Ironically, KitKat was originally a Rowntree brand – the organisation that was set up by staunch Quaker, Joseph Rowntree.  Interestingly, they were equally censorial back in the early ’80s when I was a Student at York University – York being Rowntrees’ home.  Whiel News Editor of the student mag, Nouse, we decided to run a fairly derogatory front page about Kitkat and Rowntrees latest union activities in South Africa.  Strangely, Rowntree asked us in less than polite terms to pull the publication.  Clearly we were being more than provocative and now, with corporate communication experience under my belt I can appreciate the issues of brand and reputation management.  However, a collaborative approach would have had a far better impact on student and company behaviour than heavy-handed corporate ‘big brother’.   Joseph Rowntree must be rotating gently in his grave.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
  • Netvibes
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
  • Share/Bookmark

Does my head or my heart rule my feelings over Toyota?

Wednesday, February 10th, 2010

In 1989 Toyota ran an advert with the headline “Why We’ll Never Make the Perfect Car”.  It was an ad accepting the fact that perfection can never truly be achieved, only strived for – and led me to an exchange of views with the then boss of Toyota (GB) that turned out to be a career changing one (for me at least!).

Sadly, Toyota’s brave statement is all too real as its goal of near perfection fades a little further into the distance with more than 8 million of its vehicles being recalled and questions being asked by world leaders of our supposedly super-ethical governments.

Trust me, this is not “I told you so” time!  With experience in crisis management, my head says I should feel angry that road users have been put at risk by another corporate giant trying to cover up its mistakes.  My heart is in an entirely different place.  As a former member of the Toyota (GB) PR team I can only marvel at the way Scott Brownlee and his colleagues have taken on an extraordinary task as they struggle to keep up with the deluge of information and meet the requests that face them in the battle to provide accurate information to the UK’s media.

The issue has allowed the world’s media to hunt down another global corporate giant – strangely the one which has recently become the world’s leading automotive producer with accelerated (sorry) growth at a time when the world’s economy is going to hell in a handcart (or GM vehicle); turning its insatiable search for “public interest” and the next moral panic into a feeding frenzy of high-handed hysteria.  Oh, and now the bandwagon (manufactured in America) is well and truly rolling, with news that apparently Corollas veer to the left.  I’ve been there and worn that t-shirt too in the late ’90s  -  BBC Watchdog’s Ford Sierra steering problem garbage anyone?

So is my sympathy out of misplaced loyalty, a subconscious twitch from my PR ’spin’ muscle, or something more tangible?  From experience, the public and media fantasy completely overwhelms reality and irreparable short, and possibly medium, term damage is being inflicted on Toyota’s reputation.  Sure, they have had quality issues – when you are mass producing that number of vehicles for owners who want to continually pay less and get more for the price, what do you expect?  But they admitted they had quality issues, in their starkly contrite way, nearly two years ago.  Whatever they say or do now, they can’t win.

But let’s just look at the numbers for a moment.  More than 8 million Toyotas are being recalled.  8 MILLION.  The number of worldwide reported serious incidents relating to the alleged problems will be a fraction of one percent of that figure.  Yet Toyota are recalling 8 million vehicles , with all the related costs, because of a problem that may never affect many of those cars.

As Head of Public Relations at RAC Motoring Services I was frequently under pressure to reveal the ‘most reliable/unreliable vehicle’ data.  It just doesn’t work like that!   Reliability, like car technology and the automotive industy in general, is a complex issue.  A point eloquently made by Heather Yaxley, another Toyota PR alumni, in explaining the frustrations facing the current Toyota  PRs. I can also report first-hand that, as pointed out by fellow RAC communicator Edmund King – now President of the AA – there are millions of vehicles recalled every year and many millions more that are subject to component replacement during routine servicing to rectify minor faults identified by manufacturers.  Very few motorists,  and only the better informed journalists, are even aware this happens.  It’s certainly no big deal, even if it’s a big cost for the carmaker.

In reality, regardless of how much testing is done in the lab or in quality control, some faults will only appear once a vehicle is on the road.  The good news is that almost all of these faults are picked up early – often by RAC, AA and other roadside technicians -  and manufacturers take action quickly.

In this case, Toyota have unquestionably been too slow off the mark to deal with an issue that has now incubated into a crisis.  They’re certainly not alone – look at Cadburys in 2006 with a Salmonella scare that took too long to report.   But again, look at the Toyota timeline.

While they have clearly been aware of the issues for some time, an 8 million product recall is not something that any right-minded organisation will undertake without irrefuteable evidence.  Add to that the heirarchical, procedure-driven,  and generally inflexible culture of Japanese corporations (something I’ve witnessed first-hand).  Combine it with hyper-litigious American culture fuelled by insurance urban myths, and you have a crisis waiting to happen and a virtually impossible mission for the communicatiors.  But once the tipping point of evidence plus pressure was reached, Toyota initiated a global recall and repair programme in a matter of DAYS.

But most important of all, with 3,500 road deaths and 65,000 injuries  daily on the world’s roads, it’s time to stop worrying about possibly faulty accelerators, questionably dodgy car mats and mildly inconsistent brakes.  The biggest technical threat to all of us, and the real reason people should be forced to stop driving cars whoever makes them, is the nut behind the wheel.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
  • Netvibes
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
  • Share/Bookmark

PR in a recession podcast

Tuesday, April 21st, 2009

The Net.Mentor Podcast

Simply click the play button to hear the podcast  

The Net.Mentor Podcast

Simply click the play button to hear the podcast  

Today was spent training a group of PR professionals on behalf of Talking Heads in the South West.

The theme is “PR in a Recession” and as the delegates learnt the art of podcasting, we also gained some insight on how the consultancy, commercial and public sectors are viewing public relations in times of credit crunch.    The delegates also created blogs to match!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
  • Netvibes
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
  • Share/Bookmark

A great source but not in a crisis!

Wednesday, March 26th, 2008

Frank Oviatt has picked up on a useful source of PR academia, with the new Essential Knowledge Project from the Institute of Public Relations in the US. As much as the articles are interesting in themselves, the bibliographies are equally, if not more useful. It also led me straight into some great reading.

Timothy Coombs’ paper on Crisis Management and Communications presents some fascinating, and at times surprising, research. There are some very helpful lists of best practice and an excellent bibliography. However, I do question the blame response as the best method of reputation repair, even though several of these strategies appear to be high on the Master List of those used in real crises. I can’t question the research, or that these strategies have actually been used on many occasions. What concerns me is that so many organisations in time of crisis turn to, or turn up, the ‘blame culture’ rather than taking responsibility and being open in crisis.

Professor Denis Smith, now at Glasgow University, is one of the UK’s leading authorities on crisis management and talks about ‘crisis incubation’ – i.e. issues that are left un-managed which incubate and eventually manifest themselves as apparently unrelated crises. One of the main reasons he cites is an inflexible management structure and a corporate ‘blame culture’. In Sjoberg’s recent article in Risk Management, he clearly shows that antagonism erodes trust faster than even competence or honesty.

So why on earth would any organisation hoping to protect its fragile reputation at the most critical time, choose a blame response to repair the damage?  is this a culture that is being encouraged or unsuccessfully combated by their public relations advisors?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
  • Netvibes
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
  • Share/Bookmark

Strategic intentions

Friday, March 14th, 2008

The reflection on strategies from Liam at Black Belt Dojo made me chuckle. And then it turned to a nervous laugh as I wondered which paragraph of the article in the glossy business mag we fit into. Net.Mentor Creative – one of the three strands of our business – offers advice in creating communication strategies for those organisations that either think they have something to say (but actually are saying the wrong things to the wrong people), or have something to say (but don’t know who to say it to).

Our fabulously named business mentor, Emmanuel Aharoni, starts to turn very strange shades of differing colours when the words ’strategy’ or ’strategic’ are mentioned in his presence.  “WHAT DOES IT MEAN???” he yells as we cower, pitifully, in the corner, thinking desperately of an educated reply while whimpering “it’s OK, our potential clients will know!”

The Merriam Webster dictionary definition is :

1 a (1): the science and art of employing the political, economic, psychological, and military forces of a nation or group of nations to afford the maximum support to adopted policies in peace or war

(2): the science and art of military command exercised to meet the enemy in combat under advantageous conditions b: a variety of or instance of the use of strategy 2 a: a careful plan or method : a clever stratagem b: the art of devising or employing plans or stratagems toward a goal

3: an adaptation or complex of adaptations (as of behavior, metabolism, or structure) that serves or appears to serve an important function in achieving evolutionary success <foraging strategies of insects>

Hmmm, based on this, we’d have our clients’ Boards marching up and down, issuing edicts while adapting their behaviour to forage for suitable snacks in the canteen.

PR guru and academic Anne Gregory in her chapter on Public Relations Management in Alison Theaker’s Public Relations Handbook states: “For many public relations professionals, a sign of having ‘arrived’ is obtaining ’strategic’ role signified by having a seat on the board.” OK, so far so good – strategy is obviously important. She continues: “There is growing evidence to suggest that public relations is a vital tool for strategic management“. Yes, I’m keeping up so far…She then goes on to talk about systems theory and organisational structures, which is fine, but I’m still not sure about the strategic bit. Ah, hang on, here’s something under the section “Public relations in strategy-making” which says “…suffice it to say that strategy-making involves a great deal of information gathering, analysis and decision-making.” Right, so actually, going back to Merriam Webster and the foraging strategies of insects, we may not be so very far away…I’m starting to turn a very strange shade of something.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
  • Netvibes
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
  • Share/Bookmark

Bitter Naked Schadenfreude

Friday, March 7th, 2008

As a relatively recent blogger, I found the NakedPR blog a refreshing, if acerbic, means of bringing a sense of reality to some of the blog hype. So I was sad to see that Jenn Mattern is hanging up her blogging trousers for a while. I was, however, more saddened by the way she signed off. Her last blog was a truly scathing attack on the whole of the PR blogosphere: the final set of comments, a bitter postscript to some clearly personal online spats. I’m sure she won’t give a toss what I think, but her present and future clients might recommend a more dignified exit.

Which makes me wonder: if blogging is such a bitter experience, why do people do it? DaveDorm, not unsurprisingly, took personally someone’s desire for Schadenfreude (pleasure taken from someone else’s misfortune) in reading his blog. His response only serves to reinforce my thoughts that perhaps social media should actually be re-defined as ‘anti-social’ media. Dave asks “is that why you people really come here? To revel in my pathetic life? Is that what this is? Enjoyment in my misery?” – which, of course, raises the obvious question – why would you lay your misery out for others to read? In fact, Dave’s blog has a lot of fun, left-field, ‘you really couldn’t make it up’ stuff which helps lighten the day.

He goes on to say “Being on my list is an extension of my trust. Don’t violate it.” But doesn’t that miss the whole point about blogging? In putting yourself out there and poking at issues, whether it’s NakedPR, DaveDorm, Net.Mentor, Greenbanana, Strumpette or Uncle Tom Cobley and his carthorse (sorry, couldn’t find a link to that one), we’re constantly being told that the beauty of blogging is that it’s personal communication rather than corporate puff. If that’s true, then I think we all have to be prepared to get our hearts broken once in a while and try not to feel bitter about it.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
  • Netvibes
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
  • Share/Bookmark

Flat Earth Spin

Tuesday, March 4th, 2008

The old chestnut – who depends on whom, PR or Journalist – has been repackaged, re-spun and reprinted in a new book by Nick Davies. “Flat Earth News” has engendered massive current debate in the UK and beyond. An entire edition of BBC’s You and Yours was devoted to the subject, and included Nick Davies on the programme. By their own admission, the BBC had themselves succumbed to Chatto and Windus’ PR machine in devoting an entire hour to the subject.

So is reproducing media releases without checking the facts lazy journalism? Yes. Is it the way all journalists work? Unlikely.

According to UKwatch.net the research behind the book from Cardiff University’s media boffins is a depressingly true reflection of current journalism. I’ve been both a broadcast journalist and a PR (apparently I’m supposed to be a Flack, whatever that is). On occasions I’ve been both at the same time (the worst of all worlds)!

I’ve worked in local radio newsrooms in recent years and received the “are you mad?” looks when I’ve suggested actually stepping outside the office to go on a story, rather than settling for a 20 sec clip on the ‘phone. Yes, journalism has changed. There are is less money, fewer staffers and double or treble the amount of content required. That’s Nick Davies’ point. Quality of journalism has to suffer. But is it the journalists’ fault?

PRs hold a precious commodity – news – and good PRs know how to create news and make their story more attractive and newsworthy than someone else’s. Does that make them bad people? Does it prevent journalists from using their editorial judgement and whatever investigative skills remain open to them to look beneath the surface? I don’t think so.

Naked PR’s Jennifer Mattern turns her guns on bloggers who now seem to be demanding more relaxed and ‘promotional’ releases to be issued by newswires because this is the kind of stuff bloggers want. I’m with her and PRWeb. If bloggers want credibility, they should work as hard as any other journalists, regardless of the style or medium. In fact, looking at some of the PRWeb releases, if this is the kind of stuff they want – and the kind of things PRs believe is news – then they deserve each other.

At the end of last week, I gave a lecture to a group of young PRs on briefing spokespeople. The keynote speaker was Gito Harri, who had just delivered his last piece to camera for network BBC TV news before becoming a senior media strategist at PR giants Fleishman Hillard. The money certainly had an influence, but I wonder how long it will be before his carefully honed journalistic skills become blunted by the constant chipping of unrealistic client expectations and under-resourced journalist contacts.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
  • Netvibes
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
  • Share/Bookmark

A bit of a PR Punchup!

Tuesday, January 22nd, 2008

Jennifer Mattern seems to have started a right old PR punchup with her latest blog about PR blogs. Brendan Cooper followed up with left hook on blog bullying and now there’s an unholy row going on.

There I was, minding my own rose-tinted business, bimbling along in the blogosphere, when La Mattern comes along and parks several tanks on my illusionary lawn. It seems that all is not well in PR blogland, and the there are accusations of cliques, insiders and bullying the new boys/girls on the block. Jenn’s point is that PR blogster are generally engaged in a love-fest, while Brendan states that relative newby blogsters (such as myself) are being criticised by more experience hands for raising the same issues that have been discussed on the old forums, or established blog lists. Well, welcome to the world of PR!!

Cliques, insiders and bullying (yes, try any top 20 agency for size – even the really good ones succumb once in a while). New for old – a show of hands from any PR who has re-worked an old story and gained coverage as something new…..carried unanimously by the old lags at the back. A PR luv-fest, well where were you when the champagne was last handed out, that’s the nature of the industry.

But…and it’s a but with a capital B – Jenn’s article did make me think about getting out a bit more (at least into the blogosphere). You will notice that my own blogroll is still very small at the moment and there’s a reason for that. I wouldn’t expect people to add my blog to their key list just because they are a mate, any more than I would add theirs. I believe you need to earn the place. So no hints, no begging, and no luvviedom – but if I’m one of your clique then hey, thanks anyway.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
  • Netvibes
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
  • Share/Bookmark

The subject of objectivity

Friday, January 11th, 2008

Toni Falconi’s blog about objectivity and the relationship between journalists and PRs got me thinking about the old chestnut of who needs whom more – journalists or PRs. Sitting listening as an associate berated a local news editor because they ran an exclusive story too early made me realise that as with any other commodity, news is just that – a commodity that requires bargaining, negotiating and diplomacy skills on both sides. Toni Falconi talks about “Relative Objectivity” which can lead to a competitive advantage for both parties.

In reality, what we’re talking about here is the fine line that has been trodden for many years between the purveyors of commercial/corporate interest and the seekers of ‘truth’. Peddling a message and knowing when, how, and with whom it will resonate as a news or feature story is the stock in trade of any media relations expert. Getting ‘behind the spin’ and feeling the quality rather than the width is the art of any good journalist with an instinct for news and what their audience wants.

In my view it is understanding this relationship that ultimately creates the ‘relative objectivity’ that Falconi sees as the holy grail. The difficulty comes when the lines become blurred – when journalists are employed by the corporation or PRs become writers. At what point does objectivity become damaged goods? I have just finished a short article for a client which will be added to the feature section of a trade publication. There will be no byline and I have no qualms about writing the article because while it is a product piece I believe I retain enough journalistic integrity to make it interesting, relevant and informative to the reader. In this case a response code will clearly indicate that this has been written by the manufacturer. But there have been many occasions where, in my role as a PR I have been only too happy to volunteer my journalism skills to help out an editor with little time and too much space, allowing me the opportunity to slip in a carefully placed product mention or two. Is this just part of the sale – you helped me, I’ll help you? If so, where exactly does that leave the reader?

And where does this leave the journalist who, under increasing pressure from their paymasters, is expected to write a regular blog. Think Eddie Mair on the BBC PM Programme Sure, they’re journalists, it’s what they do. But isn’t the whole point of a blog that it’s a personal thing? Reading between the lines, there is an element of forced humour, whilst making sure that there’s some mention of applying for awards or getting into the Guardian newspaper. The same with guest blog spots – the latest post on Black Belt Dojo by Kirsty Glennie on social media is certainly interesting, but it doesn’t do Siemens any harm either (there, see, they’ve got another mention). I don’t have any issue with this at all providing everybody plays the game and, most importantly, the reader/listener understands who’s working for whom and where the line is crossed between the subjective shelf and objective checkout.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
  • Netvibes
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
  • Share/Bookmark