Posts Tagged ‘blogging’

Moving content.

Tuesday, September 22nd, 2009

Those people who know me will not be surprised with my banging on about the importance of good content.  What may surprise them is that sometimes content can move me to tears.

Yes – music, lyrics, films, a paragraph in a book…if it’s well enough written or executed, words – or a combination of words, sound an image – can really get to me.  Sometimes it just creeps up on you and catches you by surprise, or just sums up professonal and personal life in a way that presses all the right/wrong buttons.  Like it did this morning when I was surfing around some of my regular blogs and Writing Boots came up with this one.  It’s not a new concept, but the execution is just beautifully done.

Content matters and, yes, it can even make the most cynical copywriters cry!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
  • Netvibes
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
  • Share/Bookmark

Push on!

Friday, May 29th, 2009

Push/pull communication is a subject of regular debate amongst my CIPR students, but a blog post by Jeremy Porter in Journalistic about this subject and ‘interruption marketing’ set me thinking about a current strategy I’m using with a client which combines both push and pull.

Porter’s premise is that push and pull, when used strategically, can both work, although pull is preferable.  But, most of all, that content is king – a point I made in a recent post and have been banging on about in our business for some time.

But Porter also raises the issue of interruptions and how this form of push can be offputting unless used strategically.  My recent experience would also suggest that a combination of the two can work powerfully.

Experts in their field of online learning, Akamas have recently started to address social media and web 2.0 for their own marketing communication.  Helped by the fact that they have in-house, recognised experts who are also excellent writers, blogging is likely to become a positive aspect of their communication.

However, as we all know, there are millions of individuals and organisations already out there and cutting through the noise to get noticed can’t just rely on Pull.  A strategy of writing for their own blog or business articles, but then notifying key online media editors seems to be paying off.   The push approach is interruptive, but only as far as saying – “we’ve written something that’s interesting and relevant to you, it’s posted on our blog or an in-house article, but please feel free to use it as an article or blog post yourself.”

The response, on the whole, has been very positive so far.  Let’s face it, an editor isn’t going to turn away relevant, well written content that may in itself create more traffic for a site that already has pulling power.

Eventually, any well written, relevant and engaging blogs should have enough of their own pull to make it onto the RSS readers or blogrolls of their key target audiences.  But in the meantime, the power of push and pull in two-way communication clearly has its benefits.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
  • Netvibes
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
  • Share/Bookmark

Let down by the Tweeple

Monday, April 27th, 2009

Last week I delivered a Talking Heads workshop on webPR to a group of delegates eager to learn the latest techniques of digital media and PR in the 21st Century.  It’s taken me a week to post this blog, because I needed time to reflect (and because Saturdays aren’t an ideal time to garner responses).

Heather Yaxley, better know to the blogosphere for her Greenbanana blog, was my co-tutor and we spent a stimulating day discussing SEO,  PR techniques and content writing for websites, social media, and creating a blog and podcast to show how easy it all is.

Naturally, throughout the day, we spent time talking about Twitter and its benefits of quick response, fast distribution, trending, citizen journalism, etc.  So what better way, I thought, to demonstrate this than to put a question out there and seek a response from the Tweeple (the people who Twitter). “Anyone got any good examples of webPR best practice?” I asked in wide-eyed anticipation.  I just wanted a couple of external ideas to inform our workshop debate from some other experts.

And that, ladies and gentlemen, was where Twitter and its exponents showed its true colours. I #tagged, I @tagged and I sent directs. Heather re-tweeted. The response was fantastic.

NOTHING! Not a sausage, nada, zip, f*(&% all.  Now, I’m not arrogant or self opinionated enough to think that Stephen Fry, Jonathan Ross or Richard Branson would sit bolt upright, drop whatever celebrity-dripping activity they were doing at the time and yell “Peter Brill’s asked me a question, I really MUST respond!” I also know that I’m a very long way from hitting my million followers. But some of the people I do follow are self-proclaimed social media ‘gurus’ who spend their entire waking hours, apparently, Tweeting their latest discoveries and words of wisdom to their glorious world of followers.

So where were you when you had the opportunity to demonstrate to sceptical PR practioners who are earning a living from the daily grind of messages delivery that social media really works? What happened that you missed an opportunity to demonstrate your expertise in a truly didactic context?

Don’t bother trying to tell me that you happened to be out at that moment, because if you haven’t already worked this out for yourselves, I could see you Twittering plenty at the same time – one of you even twittered a link about how Twitter is all about listening!!

I enjoy Twitter, it’s quick, it’s mobile and it’s easy to use.  But I’m also of the opinion that everyone is on ‘transmit’ and no-one has yet worked out what Twitter is really trying to achieve. Everybody is so busy demonstrating how busy they are being a  busy and important part of everybody else’s business, that they’ve completely lost sight of the basic principles of dialogue.

So when an opportunity presents itself to demonstrate just how positive a role Twitter can play in communications dialogue and education, it’s biggest exponents weren’t receiving.  They were too busy telling us how they’d just got out of bed, farted and brushed their teeth.

I’m sure there will be plenty of comments (one would be nice) about how I could have done this, that or the other to have changed the outcome.  Too late!  Apparently, the thing about Twitter is it’s incredible immediacy.  The moment is past. 

So our delegates left with their scepticism about Twitter intact, and I’m just carrying on transmitting tweets along with the rest of the tworld in the  hope that someone, somewhere might actually explain why they hell we’re all bothering.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
  • Netvibes
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
  • Share/Bookmark

Everybody’s doing it…should I be scared?

Saturday, April 18th, 2009

It seems like everybody’s ‘doing’ the social media and content writing thing in one way or another.  Should I feel threatened or scared?  Or should I just feel happy to be part of the whole process and comfortable (smug) about the fact that I’m far enough along the curve to have clients who are willing to pay me to help them write web content or advise them on social media activity?  

In fact, it’s a bit of both.  Chris Brogan is right when he says it’s not easy.  Tom Barnes gives me a hard time for not writing enough – and I’m still trying to work out how he has time to add so many articles to his website and still manage his clients.  And all of this angst is prompted by visting Brendan Cooper’s blog to find that he’s now officially writing content for a living. 

But the very fact that I feel comfortable in introducing possible ‘competitors’, is a kind of celebration of the fact that the whole content element of communication is really alive and kicking – perhaps more than ever. Yes, the developing communication strategies is challenging and great fun, but my writing (whether it’s blogs or media releases) and multimedia production work takes me back to the roots of what I do best – after all I started my working life as a broadcast journalist.

So, in answer to my own question: is it scary?  Yes, knowing that there are so many of us generating so much content as part of the ‘conversation’.  Is it threatening?  Possibly – I’ll soon find out if the three people I mentioned above are suddenly swamped with business generated by this blog post!  But in reality, it’s fulfilling to be able to use my creative talents on a regular basis – enough to make a living from something I really enjoy.  

Smug?  Maybe, but sometimes one needs to recognise that years of graft have led to a modicum of expertise.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
  • Netvibes
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
  • Share/Bookmark

Bitter Naked Schadenfreude

Friday, March 7th, 2008

As a relatively recent blogger, I found the NakedPR blog a refreshing, if acerbic, means of bringing a sense of reality to some of the blog hype. So I was sad to see that Jenn Mattern is hanging up her blogging trousers for a while. I was, however, more saddened by the way she signed off. Her last blog was a truly scathing attack on the whole of the PR blogosphere: the final set of comments, a bitter postscript to some clearly personal online spats. I’m sure she won’t give a toss what I think, but her present and future clients might recommend a more dignified exit.

Which makes me wonder: if blogging is such a bitter experience, why do people do it? DaveDorm, not unsurprisingly, took personally someone’s desire for Schadenfreude (pleasure taken from someone else’s misfortune) in reading his blog. His response only serves to reinforce my thoughts that perhaps social media should actually be re-defined as ‘anti-social’ media. Dave asks “is that why you people really come here? To revel in my pathetic life? Is that what this is? Enjoyment in my misery?” – which, of course, raises the obvious question – why would you lay your misery out for others to read? In fact, Dave’s blog has a lot of fun, left-field, ‘you really couldn’t make it up’ stuff which helps lighten the day.

He goes on to say “Being on my list is an extension of my trust. Don’t violate it.” But doesn’t that miss the whole point about blogging? In putting yourself out there and poking at issues, whether it’s NakedPR, DaveDorm, Net.Mentor, Greenbanana, Strumpette or Uncle Tom Cobley and his carthorse (sorry, couldn’t find a link to that one), we’re constantly being told that the beauty of blogging is that it’s personal communication rather than corporate puff. If that’s true, then I think we all have to be prepared to get our hearts broken once in a while and try not to feel bitter about it.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
  • Netvibes
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
  • Share/Bookmark

On Auto Pilot

Thursday, February 7th, 2008

As a Trekkie myself, I just can’t wait for the time when I can stand by a machine, request caviar with a glass of Krug Premier Cru and have it delivered automatically by some form of new fangled dna generation process.  It’s an immediate response to Heather Yaxley’s most recent blog on chaos and automation.   Equally, the increasing integration of traffic data, navigation and Jean Luc Picard on my Tom Tom never ceases to amaze me.  How does he know that I’ve “strayed into the Beta Quadrant” and need to make a turning manoeuvre  at the first opportunity – brilliant until the tall buildings in the centre of Bristol disconnect him from the 12 guiding satellites and I end up going the wrong way down a one-way system.  Had I simply looked up I probably would have recognised the big round red signs with the white dash in the middle!

Our dependence on automation is such that it’s easy to ignore what’s right in front of your nose.  It’s easier to txt than dial the number and actually talk to someone.  It’s easier to use an RSS feed than actually look for stuff of specific interest – or even pick up a newspaper (remember them?)  Ironically, on the Trekkie theme, I ran a quick Technorati search on automation and found that  Dave Dorm  has finally automated his StarFleetSite, apparently because he’s not getting the uptake he thought it might.  Now I’d never heard of Dave Dorm before, or even visited his, or the starfleet, blog; but I can fully empathise with his plight.  Despite the best automation in the world, the most sophisticated Readers, and sheer determination… you still can’t make the horse drink when it reaches the water.  Human perversity will always win out in the end (read Dave Dorms’ blog about obesity and Mississippi restaurants if you don’t believe me….only in America!) – and I will ignore the stat nav when I think I know better.

Anyway, I’m off to post this and tag it to death, in the vain hope that Google might automatically improve our ranking and a real person might actually read this and comment!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
  • Netvibes
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
  • Share/Bookmark

A bit of a PR Punchup!

Tuesday, January 22nd, 2008

Jennifer Mattern seems to have started a right old PR punchup with her latest blog about PR blogs. Brendan Cooper followed up with left hook on blog bullying and now there’s an unholy row going on.

There I was, minding my own rose-tinted business, bimbling along in the blogosphere, when La Mattern comes along and parks several tanks on my illusionary lawn. It seems that all is not well in PR blogland, and the there are accusations of cliques, insiders and bullying the new boys/girls on the block. Jenn’s point is that PR blogster are generally engaged in a love-fest, while Brendan states that relative newby blogsters (such as myself) are being criticised by more experience hands for raising the same issues that have been discussed on the old forums, or established blog lists. Well, welcome to the world of PR!!

Cliques, insiders and bullying (yes, try any top 20 agency for size – even the really good ones succumb once in a while). New for old – a show of hands from any PR who has re-worked an old story and gained coverage as something new…..carried unanimously by the old lags at the back. A PR luv-fest, well where were you when the champagne was last handed out, that’s the nature of the industry.

But…and it’s a but with a capital B – Jenn’s article did make me think about getting out a bit more (at least into the blogosphere). You will notice that my own blogroll is still very small at the moment and there’s a reason for that. I wouldn’t expect people to add my blog to their key list just because they are a mate, any more than I would add theirs. I believe you need to earn the place. So no hints, no begging, and no luvviedom – but if I’m one of your clique then hey, thanks anyway.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
  • Netvibes
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
  • Share/Bookmark

Today’s news comes from….

Thursday, January 17th, 2008

An item by Steve Hewlett on the BBC’s Today programme – admittedly not particularly easy listening given a convoluted writing style and constant background voiceover – did clarify some thoughts regarding journalists and online information.  The Today intro describing online radio as a “threat” and Hewlett (tongue in cheek I hope) believed that online news items gaining the greatest hits are those most desired by the “great unwashed”.  I had to chuckle at the implication that only network news providers are the true filters of news with gravitas, and that they alone are leading the crusade to educate the masses. And in reality – a serious point made by the item – where is popular news now being sourced?

Native Edge’s Andrew Arnold picked up an interesting blog on research by US Comms agency Brodeur on the use of blogs by journalists as a source of information. Jerry Johnson, Brodeur’s Exec VP who lead the research, has also received considerable comment on the stats after they were revealed at a conference.

In my own recent blog about objectivity I talked about journalists writing their own blogs – possibly under a degree of coercion from over-eager editors. What is certainly clear from this research is that journalists see the blogosphere as a vital source of information – certainly in North America – and I have little doubt that this is the case in the UK. Call it lazy journalism or just plain commonsense, but the research showed that more than 78% of journos saw bogs as a source of stories and angles, with nearly as many using blogs as a way of testing the tone of discussions on a subject. Interestingly nearly half also viewed blogs as a source of breaking news. Disturbingly, perhaps, one third saw blogs as a way of identifying and validating news sources. If this is true, then it would appear that journalists are standing up their stories based on an online persona. Certainly there are a significant number of bloggers with long and established reputations. But the thought of John Humphrys, logging on, bleary eyed to check his sources with Strumpette does add a certain frisson to the morning!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
  • Netvibes
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
  • Share/Bookmark

The subject of objectivity

Friday, January 11th, 2008

Toni Falconi’s blog about objectivity and the relationship between journalists and PRs got me thinking about the old chestnut of who needs whom more – journalists or PRs. Sitting listening as an associate berated a local news editor because they ran an exclusive story too early made me realise that as with any other commodity, news is just that – a commodity that requires bargaining, negotiating and diplomacy skills on both sides. Toni Falconi talks about “Relative Objectivity” which can lead to a competitive advantage for both parties.

In reality, what we’re talking about here is the fine line that has been trodden for many years between the purveyors of commercial/corporate interest and the seekers of ‘truth’. Peddling a message and knowing when, how, and with whom it will resonate as a news or feature story is the stock in trade of any media relations expert. Getting ‘behind the spin’ and feeling the quality rather than the width is the art of any good journalist with an instinct for news and what their audience wants.

In my view it is understanding this relationship that ultimately creates the ‘relative objectivity’ that Falconi sees as the holy grail. The difficulty comes when the lines become blurred – when journalists are employed by the corporation or PRs become writers. At what point does objectivity become damaged goods? I have just finished a short article for a client which will be added to the feature section of a trade publication. There will be no byline and I have no qualms about writing the article because while it is a product piece I believe I retain enough journalistic integrity to make it interesting, relevant and informative to the reader. In this case a response code will clearly indicate that this has been written by the manufacturer. But there have been many occasions where, in my role as a PR I have been only too happy to volunteer my journalism skills to help out an editor with little time and too much space, allowing me the opportunity to slip in a carefully placed product mention or two. Is this just part of the sale – you helped me, I’ll help you? If so, where exactly does that leave the reader?

And where does this leave the journalist who, under increasing pressure from their paymasters, is expected to write a regular blog. Think Eddie Mair on the BBC PM Programme Sure, they’re journalists, it’s what they do. But isn’t the whole point of a blog that it’s a personal thing? Reading between the lines, there is an element of forced humour, whilst making sure that there’s some mention of applying for awards or getting into the Guardian newspaper. The same with guest blog spots – the latest post on Black Belt Dojo by Kirsty Glennie on social media is certainly interesting, but it doesn’t do Siemens any harm either (there, see, they’ve got another mention). I don’t have any issue with this at all providing everybody plays the game and, most importantly, the reader/listener understands who’s working for whom and where the line is crossed between the subjective shelf and objective checkout.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
  • Netvibes
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
  • Share/Bookmark

The Net.Mentor blog

Wednesday, December 5th, 2007

Welcome to the first of what we hope will be many Net.Mentor blogs. This one is just to get us on your RSS ‘radar’ and to let you know that we will be talking about a whole range of communication issues which are likely to include:

  • Public and media relations
  • Facilitation
  • Content including blogging, texting, podcasting, social networking, etc
  • Training skills
  • Coaching, mentoring and internal communication issues

It isn’t an exclusive list and we hope to have plenty of fun postings too. The more you comment, the more we’ll post!

Thanks for joining us.

Peter & Sheila

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
  • Netvibes
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
  • Share/Bookmark