Archive for the ‘Marketing’ Category

Push on!

Friday, May 29th, 2009

Push/pull communication is a subject of regular debate amongst my CIPR students, but a blog post by Jeremy Porter in Journalistic about this subject and ‘interruption marketing’ set me thinking about a current strategy I’m using with a client which combines both push and pull.

Porter’s premise is that push and pull, when used strategically, can both work, although pull is preferable.  But, most of all, that content is king – a point I made in a recent post and have been banging on about in our business for some time.

But Porter also raises the issue of interruptions and how this form of push can be offputting unless used strategically.  My recent experience would also suggest that a combination of the two can work powerfully.

Experts in their field of online learning, Akamas have recently started to address social media and web 2.0 for their own marketing communication.  Helped by the fact that they have in-house, recognised experts who are also excellent writers, blogging is likely to become a positive aspect of their communication.

However, as we all know, there are millions of individuals and organisations already out there and cutting through the noise to get noticed can’t just rely on Pull.  A strategy of writing for their own blog or business articles, but then notifying key online media editors seems to be paying off.   The push approach is interruptive, but only as far as saying – “we’ve written something that’s interesting and relevant to you, it’s posted on our blog or an in-house article, but please feel free to use it as an article or blog post yourself.”

The response, on the whole, has been very positive so far.  Let’s face it, an editor isn’t going to turn away relevant, well written content that may in itself create more traffic for a site that already has pulling power.

Eventually, any well written, relevant and engaging blogs should have enough of their own pull to make it onto the RSS readers or blogrolls of their key target audiences.  But in the meantime, the power of push and pull in two-way communication clearly has its benefits.

  • Share/Bookmark

Meerkat magic

Tuesday, March 24th, 2009

I hate spam, and I’m getting increasingly wary of badly written newsletters and e-marketing.  So, my finger was hovering over the delete button when comparethemarket.com sent me an unsolicited e-mail (although I had used the service recently).  But just before hitting the big button, I noticed the e-mail was actually from comparethemeerkat.com and is a brilliant example of viral marketing at its very best.

I’m generally very cynical about advertising (no really), but this one definitely works.  I was up for renewing my car insurance a couple of weeks ago.  I’ve found comparison sites a complete waste of time, but the meerkat thing just nagged away in the back of my mind.  I couldn’t resist.  In fact, I did save money, but more importantly chose that site over the various others simply because of the advert that makes all of our family laugh.

As the meerkat says…”simples”

  • Share/Bookmark

What makes news?

Thursday, March 6th, 2008

Not new, but an interesting way of defining a news story. It’s business focused, fairly commonsensical, and American – but none the less valid for all that.

It was picked up by Brendan Cooper – very Relevant and Timely!

  • Share/Bookmark

All you need is Dove

Monday, January 7th, 2008

As reported by Brand Republic amongst others, it seems that the Beatles catalogue will finally become a plaything of the ad creatives. We’re talking the real deal here, not some sugar-coated, whizzed up version like the one on the Target ads, but every twang and crash from the Fab Four themselves. So, are we in for “All you Need is Dove”, or “We all live in an Orange Submarine”? Or will the the catalogue will be treated with care and sympathy?

 

It would appear that Sony and Michael Jackson’s ATV music, who co-own the rights, are set to auction-off ad usage of their Scouse silverware to the highest bidder. I’m at something of a loss to see who will benefit from a “brand partnership” – Sony/ATV, or the remaining mop tops? Clearly the partnership is off to a good start with Sony/ATV’s CEO Martin Bandier feeling he has a “moral obligation” to discuss uses of the catalogue with the Beatles members or their estates, despite having no legal need to seek their permission. Such magnanimous gestures should go a long way to reassuring them that the music will be well protected.

 

Don’t get me wrong – advertising creatives have used classic tunes to fantastic effect in the past, increasing both product and record sales at the same time – think Marvin Gaye, Levis 501 and Nick Kamen (not original according to Indra Sinha) and even Brad Pitt. Many up and coming bands are only to keen to have their latest track used to promote a well-cut piece of cloth, or provide the moody accompaniment to the latest youth hostel bloodfest.

 

But is the Beatles catalogue one step too far, or is my age just catching up with me? I just can’t quite stretch my democratic media ideals to Birds Eye and “Peas Peas Me”!

 

 

  • Share/Bookmark