Yes, it’s finally happened. I’m now on YouTube. I was recently part of an amazing evening at Ignite Bristol – an import from the Ignite concept that first happened in Seattle in 2006. As anyone who has been through any Net.Mentor training will know, I hate PowerPoint with a passion. However, the concept of a timed 5 minutes with 20 slides in quite a buzz and some of the presentations on the first evening were stimulating, moving, funny or just completely off the wall. In the end, I went for the serious topic of handling crisis, but I hope it was light enough to be all of the above. You be the judge…
Archive for the ‘communication’ Category
Does my head or my heart rule my feelings over Toyota?
Wednesday, February 10th, 2010In 1989 Toyota ran an advert with the headline “Why We’ll Never Make the Perfect Car”. It was an ad accepting the fact that perfection can never truly be achieved, only strived for – and led me to an exchange of views with the then boss of Toyota (GB) that turned out to be a career changing one (for me at least!).
Sadly, Toyota’s brave statement is all too real as its goal of near perfection fades a little further into the distance with more than 8 million of its vehicles being recalled and questions being asked by world leaders of our supposedly super-ethical governments.
Trust me, this is not “I told you so” time! With experience in crisis management, my head says I should feel angry that road users have been put at risk by another corporate giant trying to cover up its mistakes. My heart is in an entirely different place. As a former member of the Toyota (GB) PR team I can only marvel at the way Scott Brownlee and his colleagues have taken on an extraordinary task as they struggle to keep up with the deluge of information and meet the requests that face them in the battle to provide accurate information to the UK’s media.
The issue has allowed the world’s media to hunt down another global corporate giant – strangely the one which has recently become the world’s leading automotive producer with accelerated (sorry) growth at a time when the world’s economy is going to hell in a handcart (or GM vehicle); turning its insatiable search for “public interest” and the next moral panic into a feeding frenzy of high-handed hysteria. Oh, and now the bandwagon (manufactured in America) is well and truly rolling, with news that apparently Corollas veer to the left. I’ve been there and worn that t-shirt too in the late ’90s - BBC Watchdog’s Ford Sierra steering problem garbage anyone?
So is my sympathy out of misplaced loyalty, a subconscious twitch from my PR ’spin’ muscle, or something more tangible? From experience, the public and media fantasy completely overwhelms reality and irreparable short, and possibly medium, term damage is being inflicted on Toyota’s reputation. Sure, they have had quality issues – when you are mass producing that number of vehicles for owners who want to continually pay less and get more for the price, what do you expect? But they admitted they had quality issues, in their starkly contrite way, nearly two years ago. Whatever they say or do now, they can’t win.
But let’s just look at the numbers for a moment. More than 8 million Toyotas are being recalled. 8 MILLION. The number of worldwide reported serious incidents relating to the alleged problems will be a fraction of one percent of that figure. Yet Toyota are recalling 8 million vehicles , with all the related costs, because of a problem that may never affect many of those cars.
As Head of Public Relations at RAC Motoring Services I was frequently under pressure to reveal the ‘most reliable/unreliable vehicle’ data. It just doesn’t work like that! Reliability, like car technology and the automotive industy in general, is a complex issue. A point eloquently made by Heather Yaxley, another Toyota PR alumni, in explaining the frustrations facing the current Toyota PRs. I can also report first-hand that, as pointed out by fellow RAC communicator Edmund King – now President of the AA – there are millions of vehicles recalled every year and many millions more that are subject to component replacement during routine servicing to rectify minor faults identified by manufacturers. Very few motorists, and only the better informed journalists, are even aware this happens. It’s certainly no big deal, even if it’s a big cost for the carmaker.
In reality, regardless of how much testing is done in the lab or in quality control, some faults will only appear once a vehicle is on the road. The good news is that almost all of these faults are picked up early – often by RAC, AA and other roadside technicians - and manufacturers take action quickly.
In this case, Toyota have unquestionably been too slow off the mark to deal with an issue that has now incubated into a crisis. They’re certainly not alone – look at Cadburys in 2006 with a Salmonella scare that took too long to report. But again, look at the Toyota timeline.
While they have clearly been aware of the issues for some time, an 8 million product recall is not something that any right-minded organisation will undertake without irrefuteable evidence. Add to that the heirarchical, procedure-driven, and generally inflexible culture of Japanese corporations (something I’ve witnessed first-hand). Combine it with hyper-litigious American culture fuelled by insurance urban myths, and you have a crisis waiting to happen and a virtually impossible mission for the communicatiors. But once the tipping point of evidence plus pressure was reached, Toyota initiated a global recall and repair programme in a matter of DAYS.
But most important of all, with 3,500 road deaths and 65,000 injuries daily on the world’s roads, it’s time to stop worrying about possibly faulty accelerators, questionably dodgy car mats and mildly inconsistent brakes. The biggest technical threat to all of us, and the real reason people should be forced to stop driving cars whoever makes them, is the nut behind the wheel.
Baby Peter – public interest or moral panic?
Friday, August 14th, 2009The social work view of the latest media frenzy around Baby Peter once again raises the spectre of the media’s motivation for using the defence of ‘public interest’. The release of the names of those convicted of the murder of this child was driven primarily by a range of media claiming that publication was in the public interest.
Predominently the ‘interested’ are:
- those whose primary job it is to line the pockets of their billionaire proprietors or cling on to their audience ratings
- the ignorant minority who has nothing better to do than reportedly demonstrate their ‘interest’ on Facebook with calls to persecute, torture and kill those who are no longer afforded legal annonymity following pressure from… see 1. above.
Let me state, very clearly, that I carry no torch for child abusers or abusers of any kind. Net.Mentor is involved in the training of foster carers and other adults who devote themselves on a daily basis to working with vulnerable children who have suffered abuse in their formative years; abuse which – even if non-physical – can lead to physical changes in the brain. Recognising and understanding the issues surrounding these children, and the people that have abused them, will positively transform the lives of both the children and their carers and properly protect others that may be at risk. Firebombing people’s houses will not.
I have also worked as a journalist and in media relations long enough to understand what makes a ‘good’ story. However, I have witnessed first hand the devastation caused to individuals and their families ‘identified’ by the media and/or ‘interested’ neighbours as being connected with child abuse. The News of the World naming and shaming campaign in 2001, which used indistinct (and often out of date) images, led to many completely innocent victims of lynchmob hysteria.
I spent three depressing days working with a crisis management team to help one of those victims as they were hounded by both media and neighbours bent on misguided ‘revenge’, based on wrongful identification from an image that bore no possible resemblence to the individual concerned. All, of course, in the name of ‘public interest’.
Those involved in the tragic Baby Peter case have been found guilty of their crimes – fact! They face long prison sentences – almost certainly in isolation – I hope they are never allowed out. But what benefit, or interest, is there in publishing their details?
Moral panics are nothing new – Stan Cohen first coined the term in 1972, refering to the Mods and Rockers battles in the 1960s when reaction by Brighton’s chattering classes developed into government debates and mass, UK-wide hysteria. Asking the media to act responsibly to prevent fuelling, or even starting, the fires of moral panic is like asking them to stop breathing. Witness the recent coverage of the credit crunch and swine flu.
So what hope? It can only be the small voice of informed reason continuing to shout as loudly as possible in the vain hope that mawkish, voyeuristic ‘public interest’ might turn into better informed audiences demanding better reporting standards from its media and better trained professionals to prevent cases like Baby Peter being allowed to happen in the first place.
Peter Brill
PR in a recession podcast
Tuesday, April 21st, 2009The Net.Mentor Podcast
Simply click the play button to hear the podcastThe Net.Mentor Podcast
Simply click the play button to hear the podcastToday was spent training a group of PR professionals on behalf of Talking Heads in the South West.
The theme is “PR in a Recession” and as the delegates learnt the art of podcasting, we also gained some insight on how the consultancy, commercial and public sectors are viewing public relations in times of credit crunch. The delegates also created blogs to match!
Meerkat magic
Tuesday, March 24th, 2009I hate spam, and I’m getting increasingly wary of badly written newsletters and e-marketing. So, my finger was hovering over the delete button when comparethemarket.com sent me an unsolicited e-mail (although I had used the service recently). But just before hitting the big button, I noticed the e-mail was actually from comparethemeerkat.com and is a brilliant example of viral marketing at its very best.
I’m generally very cynical about advertising (no really), but this one definitely works. I was up for renewing my car insurance a couple of weeks ago. I’ve found comparison sites a complete waste of time, but the meerkat thing just nagged away in the back of my mind. I couldn’t resist. In fact, I did save money, but more importantly chose that site over the various others simply because of the advert that makes all of our family laugh.
As the meerkat says…”simples”