Archive for the ‘Media’ Category

I’ve finally arrived!!!

Monday, April 12th, 2010

Yes, it’s finally happened.  I’m now on YouTube.  I was recently part of an amazing evening at Ignite Bristol – an import from the Ignite concept that first happened in Seattle in 2006.  As anyone who has been through any Net.Mentor training will know, I hate PowerPoint with a passion.  However, the concept of a timed 5 minutes with 20 slides in quite a buzz and some of the presentations on the first evening were stimulating, moving, funny or just completely off the wall.  In the end, I went for the serious topic of handling crisis, but I hope it was light enough to be all of the above.  You be the judge…

  • Share/Bookmark

Does my head or my heart rule my feelings over Toyota?

Wednesday, February 10th, 2010

In 1989 Toyota ran an advert with the headline “Why We’ll Never Make the Perfect Car”.  It was an ad accepting the fact that perfection can never truly be achieved, only strived for – and led me to an exchange of views with the then boss of Toyota (GB) that turned out to be a career changing one (for me at least!).

Sadly, Toyota’s brave statement is all too real as its goal of near perfection fades a little further into the distance with more than 8 million of its vehicles being recalled and questions being asked by world leaders of our supposedly super-ethical governments.

Trust me, this is not “I told you so” time!  With experience in crisis management, my head says I should feel angry that road users have been put at risk by another corporate giant trying to cover up its mistakes.  My heart is in an entirely different place.  As a former member of the Toyota (GB) PR team I can only marvel at the way Scott Brownlee and his colleagues have taken on an extraordinary task as they struggle to keep up with the deluge of information and meet the requests that face them in the battle to provide accurate information to the UK’s media.

The issue has allowed the world’s media to hunt down another global corporate giant – strangely the one which has recently become the world’s leading automotive producer with accelerated (sorry) growth at a time when the world’s economy is going to hell in a handcart (or GM vehicle); turning its insatiable search for “public interest” and the next moral panic into a feeding frenzy of high-handed hysteria.  Oh, and now the bandwagon (manufactured in America) is well and truly rolling, with news that apparently Corollas veer to the left.  I’ve been there and worn that t-shirt too in the late ’90s  -  BBC Watchdog’s Ford Sierra steering problem garbage anyone?

So is my sympathy out of misplaced loyalty, a subconscious twitch from my PR ’spin’ muscle, or something more tangible?  From experience, the public and media fantasy completely overwhelms reality and irreparable short, and possibly medium, term damage is being inflicted on Toyota’s reputation.  Sure, they have had quality issues – when you are mass producing that number of vehicles for owners who want to continually pay less and get more for the price, what do you expect?  But they admitted they had quality issues, in their starkly contrite way, nearly two years ago.  Whatever they say or do now, they can’t win.

But let’s just look at the numbers for a moment.  More than 8 million Toyotas are being recalled.  8 MILLION.  The number of worldwide reported serious incidents relating to the alleged problems will be a fraction of one percent of that figure.  Yet Toyota are recalling 8 million vehicles , with all the related costs, because of a problem that may never affect many of those cars.

As Head of Public Relations at RAC Motoring Services I was frequently under pressure to reveal the ‘most reliable/unreliable vehicle’ data.  It just doesn’t work like that!   Reliability, like car technology and the automotive industy in general, is a complex issue.  A point eloquently made by Heather Yaxley, another Toyota PR alumni, in explaining the frustrations facing the current Toyota  PRs. I can also report first-hand that, as pointed out by fellow RAC communicator Edmund King – now President of the AA – there are millions of vehicles recalled every year and many millions more that are subject to component replacement during routine servicing to rectify minor faults identified by manufacturers.  Very few motorists,  and only the better informed journalists, are even aware this happens.  It’s certainly no big deal, even if it’s a big cost for the carmaker.

In reality, regardless of how much testing is done in the lab or in quality control, some faults will only appear once a vehicle is on the road.  The good news is that almost all of these faults are picked up early – often by RAC, AA and other roadside technicians -  and manufacturers take action quickly.

In this case, Toyota have unquestionably been too slow off the mark to deal with an issue that has now incubated into a crisis.  They’re certainly not alone – look at Cadburys in 2006 with a Salmonella scare that took too long to report.   But again, look at the Toyota timeline.

While they have clearly been aware of the issues for some time, an 8 million product recall is not something that any right-minded organisation will undertake without irrefuteable evidence.  Add to that the heirarchical, procedure-driven,  and generally inflexible culture of Japanese corporations (something I’ve witnessed first-hand).  Combine it with hyper-litigious American culture fuelled by insurance urban myths, and you have a crisis waiting to happen and a virtually impossible mission for the communicatiors.  But once the tipping point of evidence plus pressure was reached, Toyota initiated a global recall and repair programme in a matter of DAYS.

But most important of all, with 3,500 road deaths and 65,000 injuries  daily on the world’s roads, it’s time to stop worrying about possibly faulty accelerators, questionably dodgy car mats and mildly inconsistent brakes.  The biggest technical threat to all of us, and the real reason people should be forced to stop driving cars whoever makes them, is the nut behind the wheel.

  • Share/Bookmark

Professionals still have the journalistic edge

Thursday, December 10th, 2009

The role of the citizen journalist is clearly here to stay and, with the speed of delivery and monitoring of breaking/trending topics through the social media, this role is only ever likely to be strengthened.

However,  this doesn’t mean the end of the line for the professional journalist – a point well made in Jeremy Porter’s recent post.  Having trained and worked as a broadcast journalist, I know that the ability to point a mobile phone in the direction of a major event happening in front of you doesn’t automatically make you  a journalist.  It creates plenty of informed observers and that is only to be welcomed if, as in the case of Ian Tomlinson’s death during the G20 clashes in London, observational reality  can become a conduit to justice.

Major incidents, such as the Paddington rail crash, have plenty of eye witnesses who were only too keen to share their experiences on what was happening – although social media was in its infancy in 1999 when that particular event happened.  In that case there were BBC journalists travelling on the trains involved and it was they who called on to provide objective, descriptive and relatively balanced reports at the scene within minutes of the event and in subsequent news bulletins.

Although professional journalists may not always be immediately on hand for every incident, it is a safe assumption that during major, newsworthy events (the Hudson river plane crash being another example), the news-hungry public may turn to citizen journalism social media for their instant gratification, but will still rely on the professionals to undertake the gathering, filtering, editing, summarising and opinion-forming to deliver the ‘bigger picture’.

Long may it continue!

  • Share/Bookmark

BBC Drop the ball over Griffin

Friday, October 30th, 2009

The screaming headlines from the Sun to the Guardian.  The hours of broadcast from Today to CNN.  And the final revelation that…oh my, Nick Griffin is a fascist.

To be honest, I didn’t want to add to the millions of words already devoted to this subject and fuel the flames of his publicity.  But having re-watched the BBC Question Time programme and the pre and post media frenzy, I have been left feeling numbed by the ineptitude of the UK’s public service broadcaster.

Griffin is an MEP, he is elected, we live in a democracy, the BBC were right to broadcast.

Sadly, it went downhill from there.  The carefully selected panel was no surprise (although Jack Straw was surprisingly poor), neither was the make-up of the audience.  What did surprise me was just how dramatically Dimbleby and the producers prostituted themselves in their desire to ensure we knew just how ignorant and bigotted Griffin is…for more than 30 minutes…without cessation.  It took possibly 3 minutes for the point to be made (perhaps 5 for the less intelligent members of the audience).  Job done.

What was completely missed was the fact that Griffin, and his even more disturbing side-kick Andrew Brons, are in a position to influence European legislation – the implications of which reach far beyond just British shores.  If  Dimbleby hadn’t allowed the red mist and the ill advice of the BBC’s editors and senior PRs to descend, he would have realised that had he conducted the remaining 55 minutes of the programme in the usual format, Griffin and, more importantly, his party would have been exposed as the political danger they truly represent.

The Nazi thugs will always vote for Griffin and his ilk because of their misguided values.  It’s the so-called ‘protest voters’, who apparently have no-one else to vote for, that needed to be shown the true implications of what they have done by witnessing not the moral bankruptcy of the individual, but the political immorality and ineptitude of the party for which he was acting as a representative on the night.

There is no doubt in my mind that had he become imbroiled in the standard of political debate usually engendered by a ‘normal’ Question Time, he would have buried, beyond any hope of redemption, both his party and himself at every turn.  Instead, the coffin lid was left ajar and, dracula-like,  he  squeezed out and into a world of PR opportunities for himself and his party.

The panel and audience may have felt a sense of smug satisfaction at the end of the evening, but the fact that fascist extremists have been allowed to walk away with even the slightest glimmer of opportunity means the BBC has very little to be satisfied about.   I thought Dimbleby was the best man for the job.  He blew it!

  • Share/Bookmark

Baby Peter – public interest or moral panic?

Friday, August 14th, 2009

The social work view of the latest media frenzy around Baby Peter once again raises the spectre of the media’s motivation for using the defence of  ‘public interest’.  The release of the names of those convicted of the murder of this child was driven primarily by a range of media claiming that publication was in the public interest.

Predominently the ‘interested’ are:

  1. those whose primary job it is to line the pockets of their billionaire proprietors or cling on to their audience ratings
  2. the ignorant minority who has nothing better to do than reportedly demonstrate their ‘interest’ on Facebook  with calls to persecute, torture and kill those who are no longer afforded legal annonymity following pressure from… see 1. above.

Let me state, very clearly, that I carry no torch for child abusers or abusers of any kind.  Net.Mentor is involved in the training of foster carers and other adults who devote themselves on a daily basis to working with vulnerable children who have suffered abuse in their formative  years; abuse which – even if non-physical – can lead to physical changes in the brain.  Recognising and understanding the issues surrounding these children, and the people that have abused them, will positively transform the lives of both the children and their carers and properly protect others that may be at risk.  Firebombing people’s houses will not.

I have also worked as a journalist and in media relations long enough to understand what makes a ‘good’ story.   However,  I have witnessed first hand the devastation caused to individuals and their families ‘identified’ by the media and/or  ‘interested’  neighbours as being connected with child abuse.  The News of the World naming and shaming campaign in 2001, which used indistinct (and often out of date) images,  led to many completely innocent victims of lynchmob hysteria.

I spent three depressing days working with a crisis management team to help one of those victims as they were hounded by both media and neighbours bent on misguided ‘revenge’, based on wrongful identification from an image that bore no possible resemblence to the individual concerned.  All, of course, in the name of ‘public interest’.

Those involved in the tragic Baby Peter case have been found guilty of their crimes – fact!  They face long prison sentences – almost certainly in isolation – I hope they are never allowed out.  But what benefit, or interest, is there in publishing their details?

Moral panics are nothing new – Stan Cohen first coined the term in 1972, refering to the Mods and Rockers battles in the 1960s when reaction by Brighton’s chattering classes developed into government debates and mass, UK-wide hysteria.  Asking the media to act responsibly to prevent fuelling, or even starting, the fires of moral panic is like asking them to stop breathing.  Witness the recent coverage of the credit crunch and swine flu.

So what hope?  It can only be the small voice of informed reason continuing to shout as loudly as possible in the vain hope that mawkish, voyeuristic  ‘public interest’ might turn into better informed audiences demanding better reporting standards from its media and better trained professionals to prevent cases like Baby Peter being allowed to happen in the first place.

Peter Brill

  • Share/Bookmark

Facebook – it’s business, as usual

Wednesday, January 7th, 2009

 Matt, a regular contributor to the PRBristol site, picked up an interesting Comscore graph about the rise of Facebook against other social media sites.

Although interesting in itself, it also offers a standard business insight into a social media entity that many people are claiming to be “bored” with.  As with so many products and services on and offline, Facebook is showing the traditional curve of business maturity.  As the innovators and early adopters move away to tell everyone about their every move on Twitter,  the early and late majority have moved in to boost Facebook’s growth.

I have to admit to having been a fully signed-up member of the “I really can’t see the point, get out more”  school, but my fascination with Facebook has, like the graph, risen over recent months and find I am using it more and more for business networking, along with LinkedIn, which seems to be going through a dramatic rennaisance.  So I guess I’m just another member of the late majority.

Ho hum, one day maybe I’ll innovate!

  • Share/Bookmark

Flat Earth Spin

Tuesday, March 4th, 2008

The old chestnut – who depends on whom, PR or Journalist – has been repackaged, re-spun and reprinted in a new book by Nick Davies. “Flat Earth News” has engendered massive current debate in the UK and beyond. An entire edition of BBC’s You and Yours was devoted to the subject, and included Nick Davies on the programme. By their own admission, the BBC had themselves succumbed to Chatto and Windus’ PR machine in devoting an entire hour to the subject.

So is reproducing media releases without checking the facts lazy journalism? Yes. Is it the way all journalists work? Unlikely.

According to UKwatch.net the research behind the book from Cardiff University’s media boffins is a depressingly true reflection of current journalism. I’ve been both a broadcast journalist and a PR (apparently I’m supposed to be a Flack, whatever that is). On occasions I’ve been both at the same time (the worst of all worlds)!

I’ve worked in local radio newsrooms in recent years and received the “are you mad?” looks when I’ve suggested actually stepping outside the office to go on a story, rather than settling for a 20 sec clip on the ‘phone. Yes, journalism has changed. There are is less money, fewer staffers and double or treble the amount of content required. That’s Nick Davies’ point. Quality of journalism has to suffer. But is it the journalists’ fault?

PRs hold a precious commodity – news – and good PRs know how to create news and make their story more attractive and newsworthy than someone else’s. Does that make them bad people? Does it prevent journalists from using their editorial judgement and whatever investigative skills remain open to them to look beneath the surface? I don’t think so.

Naked PR’s Jennifer Mattern turns her guns on bloggers who now seem to be demanding more relaxed and ‘promotional’ releases to be issued by newswires because this is the kind of stuff bloggers want. I’m with her and PRWeb. If bloggers want credibility, they should work as hard as any other journalists, regardless of the style or medium. In fact, looking at some of the PRWeb releases, if this is the kind of stuff they want – and the kind of things PRs believe is news – then they deserve each other.

At the end of last week, I gave a lecture to a group of young PRs on briefing spokespeople. The keynote speaker was Gito Harri, who had just delivered his last piece to camera for network BBC TV news before becoming a senior media strategist at PR giants Fleishman Hillard. The money certainly had an influence, but I wonder how long it will be before his carefully honed journalistic skills become blunted by the constant chipping of unrealistic client expectations and under-resourced journalist contacts.

  • Share/Bookmark

Turning things upside down

Friday, February 29th, 2008

It’s not often that I’m stopped in my tracks by creativity, but as a content writer I was genuinely moved by a simple piece of writing that became a TV advert. Highlighted by the Blackbelt Dojo team, this advert for Argentinian Presidential candidate Lopez Murphy is simple and obvious for the first half, and with a blindingly obvious but cleverly revealing and powerful second half.

Most importantly it has made me stop, think and consider perspective. The art of good writing is still alive.

  • Share/Bookmark

European radio goes online

Wednesday, February 27th, 2008

And just when you need support for your last blog posting…along comes the pan-European online radio initiative by some of Europe’s bigger broadcasters which was launched yesterday. Euranet only serves to reinforce the fact that radio stations are only too aware of the power of the internet. Even more positive is the net’s ability to bring out the collaborative gene in big media organisations. Bring it on.

  • Share/Bookmark

Nokia does radio

Tuesday, February 26th, 2008

It seems that Nokia are keen to get in on the radio act according to Radio Today.  They’re asking online radio stations to register and be put on a pre-loaded directory on their latest phones.  It’s certainly good news for the smaller community stations – I’m involved in Radio Salaam Shalom, the UK’s first Muslim/Jewish Radio station, for example.  What interest me about Nokia’s move is whether (and how) they might prioritise the list.  I can’t believe it will simply be an alphabetical, worldwide list.  If it is, the “main reason to be listed in order to let the audience discover and enjoy your station” seems, in fact to be just another list lottery.

Will they categorise, for example, or regionalise, or base it on link volumes once the list is up and running?

The other interesting point is Radio Today’s comment that  “it seems the future of radio could be online”.  Is this a misprint, do they mean “mobile”? I think the online future of radio arrived about two years ago and that radio is settling into an exciting blend of terrestrial, online and mobile (through listen again/podcast features).  In addition the rise of DIY radio and music mixes – thanks to Brendan Cooper I recently discovered Musicovery which is a revelation – makes me think that radio is alive and well and more exciting than ever.  There speaks the haggard, unbiased radio journalist.

  • Share/Bookmark